UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. ASHA DEVI AND OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-2009-10-119
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on October 23,2009

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Appellant
VERSUS
ASHA DEVI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.P.MEHROTRA,RAJESH CHANDRA,J - (1.) THE present Appeal has been filed by the appellant/Insurance Company against the award dated 29.7.2009 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kaushambi in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 28 of 2004 in respect of an accident which took place at about 6.00 a.m. on 14.7.2004 wherein Krishna Babu while going on cycle on main road in Village Siryawan (Chauraha) was hit by Jeep No. UP70Y-9962 resulting in grievous injuries to the said Krishna Babu and his consequent death.
(2.) THE Claim Petition was filed by the claimant/respondent nos. 1 to 5, interalia, stating that the said Krishna Babu was going by cycle to sell bread etc at about 6.00 a.m. on 14.7.2004. When the said Krishna Babu reached near Siriyawan Chauraha under Police Station Charawa, District-Kaushambi, the aforesaid vehicle in question, which was coming in rash and negligent manner, hit the said Krishna Babu causing grievous injuries, and consequently the said Krishna Babu died. A case being Case Crime No. 42 of 2004 under Section 279/304A/427 I.P.C. was registered. The aforesaid vehicle in question was owned by Ramesh Chandra Kesarwani (respondent no.6 herein), and it was insured with the appellant/Insurance Company. Following five Issues were framed by the Tribunal in the case: 1. Whether on 14.7.2004 at about 6.00 a.m. Jeep No. U.P.70Y/9962 which was being driven in a rash and negligent manner hit Krishna Babu who was going by cycle on Main Road in village Siriyawan (Chauraha) grievous injuries and which resulted in his death? 2. Whether the said Jeep No. U.P.70Y/9962 was not insured with United India Insurance Company Ltd.? If yes, then its effect? 3. Whether the Driver of the offending vehicle Jeep No. U.P. 70Y/9962 did not had valid D.L. on the day of the accident? 4. Whether the claimant is entitled to any relief? If he is, then how much and from whom? 5. Relief, if any?
(3.) ISSUE No.1, as noted above, was in regard to factum of accident on account of rash and negligent driving by the driver of the vehicle in question, resulting in hitting the said Krishna Babu, who sustained grievous injuries and consequently died. The said Issue was decided by the Tribunal in the affirmative and in favour of the claimant/respondent nos. 1 to 5. It was held by the Tribunal that the accident in question took place due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of the vehicle in question.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.