JUDGEMENT
RAKESH TIWARI, J. -
(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties and perused the record.
(2.) THE petitioner was appointed as Clerk in Junior High School Lokmanpur,
District Allahabad on 1st July, 1977. The
said institution is run by a Society which
had initially started the Junior High
School in village Lakmanpur, District
Allahabad. It was granted permanent
recognition with effect from July, 1974 by
letter dated 10th July, 1976 of the Deputy
Director of Education V Region,
Allahabad. The Committee of
Management of the aforesaid Junior High
School sought approval of the Basic
Shiksha Adhikari for appointment of the
petitioner which was approved from the
date of his appointment i.e. 1st July, 1977.
The aforesaid Junior High School was
upgraded to the level of High School
which was then recognized by the Board
of High School and Intermediate
Education under the provisions of Section 7-A of the U.P Intermediate Education
Act, 1921. The post of Clerk was also
sanctioned by the Directorate of
Education, Allahabad vide his order dated
22nd September, 1990. The institution was taken in grants-in-aid list and as such
the U.P. High School and Intermediate
Colleges (Payment of Salaries of
Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1971 became applicable w.e.f. 1st
April, 1991.
It is claimed that as a consequence the petitioner who was a
permanent clerk working in the Junior
High School since Ist July, 1977
automatically became permanent clerk
w.e.f. 23rd December, 1981 of Sarvodaya
Shiksha Sadan Uchchatar Madhyamik
Vidyalaya, Lokmanpur, District
Allahabad, according to Regulation 4 read
with Regulation 100 of Chapter II of the
U.P. Intermediate Education Act as the
petitioner possessed the necessary
qualification for appointment as clerk in
the Intermediate College, he was regularly
paid his salary by the Committee of
Management from the date of his
appointment dated 1st July, 1977 till 31st
March, 1991.
(3.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that the Committee of Management has
submitted his salary bill to the DIOS,
Allahabad from Ist April, 1991 regularly
but his salary was not paid, rather a notice
was sent by the DIOS on 11th June, 1992
to the Committee of Management to show
cause as to why the appointment of the
petitioner as Clerk in the Junior High
School may not be treated as invalid on
the ground that he happened to be the
nephew of the Manager of the institution.
This letter was sent under the Basic
Shiksha Sanhita in which there was
restraint on the appointment of the
relative of the Manager of the institution.
Copy of the notice etc. was not served
upon the petitioner. However, the
Committee of Management sent a reply of
the aforesaid letter of the DIOS on 20th
October, 1992, which has been appended
as Annexure-VIII to the writ petition.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.