JUDGEMENT
A.P.SAHI,J. -
(1.) HEARD Sri R.K. Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner assisted by Sri
Ripu Daman Singh and Sri V.K.
Upadhyaya, learned Senior Counsel
assisted by Sri Ritvik Upadhyaya for the
respondent No.4-Committee of
Management. Sri Ashok Khare, learned
Senior Counsel has filed an impleadment
application on behalf of the person, who
is stated to be functioning as an
Officiating Principal of the Institution.
The said application has been entertained
under Chapter 22 Rule 5-A of the
Allahabad High Court Rules. Sri A.K.
Yadav, learned counsel has been heard for
respondent No.5 and learned Standing
Counsel for the respondents No.1 to 3.
(2.) THIS petition questions the selections on the post of Principal in
Aditya Birla Inter College, Renukoot,
Sonebhadra, which is an institution
recognized and governed by the
provisions of the U.P. Intermediate
Education Act, 1921 and the Regulations
framed thereunder. The institution is
under the grant-in-aid list of the State
Government for running twenty-four
Sections upto the level of High School for
which recognition already stood granted
by the State Government. The selection of
teachers and the Head of the Institution is
governed by the provisions of the U.P.
Secondary Education Services Selection
Board Act, 1982.
The facts shorn of details are that the Institution was initially recognized as
a Junior High School under the relevant
provisions then existing on 19th June,
1964. The institution was accorded permission and recognition whereupon it
stood upgraded as High School w.e.f.
25th January, 1965. A copy of the said recognition order has been filed as
Annexure- 2 to the counter affidavit filed
on behalf of the Management. The High
School level of the institution was from
time to time given the benefit of running
additional sections which according to Sri
Upadhayaya has swelled to 24, and grantin-
aid to the High School level of the
Institution was extended on 31st March
1984. Subsequently, upon expansion of the Institution, the Management applied
for recognition upto the Intermediate level
upon which the competent authority vide
order dated 30th March, 1998 extended
the benefit of running Intermediate
classes under the provisions of Section 7-
A(a) of the 1921 Act. The said
recognition was modified later on with
additional sanction of subjects vide order
dated 23.8.2000, Annexure-8 to the
counter affidavit, 21.8.2004, Annexure 9
to the counter affidavit and 03.5.2005,
Annexure 10 to the counter affidavit.
There is a significant indication with
regard to condition No.5 in the
recognition order dated 30.3.1998
wherein Clause 5 of the said recognition
indicates that the institution shall appoint
a qualified Head of the Institution.
However, this condition has been scored
out in the subsequent orders of the year
2000, 2004 and 2005.
(3.) THE present dispute relates to the selection and appointment on the post of
Principal of the Institution by the U.P.
Secondary Education Service Selection
Board which has proceeded to select the
petitioner Kaushal Kumar Singh treating
the Institution of having a post of a Head
Master of the High School level for which
selections have been held and against
which the placement of the petitioner has
been made. The requisition for such
selection on an earlier occasion had been
sent in the year 1991. However, selections
were not held on the said post and as
noticed above, in between, the institution
came to be recognized as an Intermediate
college for the subjects, as referred to in
the recognition orders and filed along
with counter affidavit from 30.3.1998
onwards. It appears that there was an
internal communication about the holding
of selection on the said post and it is
alleged that the requisition was again sent
on 27th of September, 2000 by the
District Inspector of Schools, Sonebhadra
requesting the Commission to hold a
selection on the post in question. It has
also been stated that a further verification
was made in this regard whereafter the
Board has proceeded to hold selections
and has selected the petitioner against the
said post.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.