JUDGEMENT
RAVINDRA SINGH,J. -
(1.) THIS application under section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Gayasuddin
with a prayer to quash the order dated
9.8.2004 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau whereby the
application under section 156(3), Cr.P.C.
filed by the applicant has been rejected.
It is further prayed that a suitable direction may be issued to the Officer-in-
Charge of Police Station Ghosi to register the FIR and to investigate the same.
(2.) THE facts, in brief, of this case are that applicant Gayasuddin moved
an application dated 9.8.2004 under section 156(3), Cr.P.C. in the Court of
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau
with a prayer that the Officer-in-Charge
of Police Station Ghosi may be directed
to register the FIR and investigate the
same against Sala Uddin, Husn Bano,
Mohammad Yasin and Mahboob
Ahmad. The allegation has been made
against them that the applicant was doing the business of sale and purchase of
saris, he was having love affair with
Rizwana Khatoon, daughter of Mohiuddin and sister of Salauddin and on
26.7.2002, he has performed the Nikah with Rizwana Khatoon according to
Muslim Law. Rizwana Khatoon and the
applicant were major but due to their
marriage, the father and brother of Rizwana Khatoon were too much annoyed
and lodged a false case against the applicant. The applicant and Rizwana
Khatoon were present at the chamber of
Sri Rama Shanker Misra, advocate,
where the applicant was beaten and
Rizwana Khatoon was forcibly taken by
her brother Salauddin and others to
Kotwali Deoria, thereafter she was taken
to their house, she was terrorised there,
she has been made against the applicant, the false recovery of that girl has
been made, she was medically examined
thereafter her statement has been recorded in the Court of learned Magistrate, she has been illegally detained and
she is being subjected to cruelty and she
is not permitted to go to the house of the
applicant, she had lived in the company
of the applicant as wife, subsequently,
she has become pregnant. The applicant
requested to hand-over his wife and
tried to know about the pregnancy but
no proper information had been given
and he was abused and he was asked
not to think about Rizwana Khatoon
and her son, thereafter he was sent to
jail in Case Crime No. 422 of 2002 under
sections 363, 366, 376, 504 and 506,
I.P.C., Police Station Ghosi, District
Mau. In medical examination it was
found that Rizwana Khatoon was having the pregnancy but the pregnancy
has been terminated by her brother and
others. Considering the application
moved by the applicant, the learned
CJM Mau came to the conclusion that
Rizwana Khatoon is the victim, she has
beer kidnapped and raped by the applicant, its FIR in Case Crime No. 442 of
2002 under sections 363, 366, 376, 504 and 506, I.P.C., P.S. Ghosi, District Mau
has already been registered, but the plea
taken by the applicant that Rizwana
Khatoon is his wife is highly disputed,
moving of the application by the applicant under section 156(3), Cr.P.C, is
simply misuse of the process of law,
thereafter rejected the application under
section 156(3), Cr.P.C. on 9.8.2004.
Being aggrieved from the order dated 9.8.2004, the present application
has been filed by the applicant.
(3.) HEARD Sri Manoj Kumar Chandel, learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P.;