PIYARA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2009-1-71
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 21,2009

PIYARA DEVI Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD Sri Riyaz Ahmad learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Aushutosh Shukla holding brief of Jogendra Nath Verma for opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 learned Standing Counsel for opposite party No. 1 and Sri M. S. Rathore for opposite party No. 4.
(2.) THE petitioner has filed this writ peti tion against her disengagement from the post of Shiksha Mitra vide order passed on 20-12-2007 by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Sultanpur. THE impugned order has been an nexed as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the reason for disengagement of the petitioner is the Government Order dated 15-6-2007. Wherein it has been provided that if an un married lady gets married to a man living in another village panchayat then her appoint ment can not be continued in her native place. Since the petitioner who was duly selected for Primary School, Shivpur, Village Panchayat Ghatampur got married, hence, she was disengaged according to provisions of the said Government Order. It is strange that the letter does not speak about the place where the petitioner has got married and simply on the basis of some complaint the services of the petitioner have been terminated. THE case of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that she got married in the same village panchayat and not outside. Be that as it may. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before us another Government Order dated 21-1-2008 which has been admitted by the learned counsel for the opposite party No. 3 as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the State. This Govern ment Order is taken on record. A perusal of this Government Order says that the stipu lated condition under Government Order dated 15-6-2007 has been modified/amended to the extent that if an unmarried lady who is appointed as Shiksha Mitra gets married to a person outside the village panchayat then her services will not automatically come to an end nor can be terminated on this ground unless she herself submits her resignation. In the present case the petitioner has not submitted any resignation of her own, hence, the case of the petitioner is covered by the Government Order dated 21-1-2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner further sub mits that even in the counter affidavit it has not been stated as to where and in which vil lage panchayat the petitioner has been mar ried. The impugned order dated 20-12-2007 was passed only on the basis of a vague com plaint of village Pradhan without making any enquiry, without calling an explanation, with out issuing any notice and without giving any opportunity to the petitioner to defend the im pugned order.
(3.) IN any view of the matter the situation can not be assessed to the disadvantage of the petitioner. The vested right of a person can not be taken away merely on the basis of com plaint. More so in the case where the com plaint is vague and does not specify the legal grounds on which a vested right can be taken away. Even if, the complaint is right in sub stance a vested right of a person can only be taken away after giving him or her an oppor tunity to explain and meet out the charges. This is the basic principle of natural justice and nobody can be condemned or put to dis-advantage without giving him or her oppor tunity of hearing. If a person who is legally appointed and working is disengaged merely on the basis of complaints without verifica tion and without adhering to the principles of natural justice, no employee will ever feel safe in his working. The principle of natural jus tice have to be adhered to otherwise the ac tion of the government will never be able to pass the test of rule of law. On 11-1-2008 this court has already passed an order that no fresh appointment shall be made on the post in question. It is admitted that the petitioner was already se lected and due to interim order the post is still vacant and the petitioner is entitled accord ing to the government order. It is, therefore, directed that the opposite parties shall allow the petitioner to join as Shiksha Mitra in the Primary School, Shivpur, Village Panchayat Ghatampur, District Sultanpur forthwith.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.