JUDGEMENT
D.K.Seth, J. -
(1.) These group of writ petitions have been heard together by the consent of parties since common
questions of law and facts are involved in these cases. They are being disposed of by common
judgment.
(2.) After referring to the common facts, we shall refer to the scope of the respective writ petitions
separately. The common facts giving rise to the respective cases are summarised as hereinafter.
(3.) Some vacancies in the post of Readers, Lecturers and Professors arose in the Allahabad
University before June, 1993. On 15.6.1993 applications were invited through public
advertisements (Annexure-1, 1A and IB) for 8 posts of Lecturers and 4 posts of Readers and one
post of Professor in the Department of Chemistry in the said University. The Petitioners (in writ
petition No. 21723 of 1995), hereinafter referred to as the petitioners, were called for interview
by letters issued on 26.11.1993. The interviews were held between 12.12.1993 and 15.12.1993.
The recommendation of the Selection Committee, excepting that of Dr. Dinesh Mani (petitioner
No. 8), was accepted by the appointing authority (Executive Council) in its meeting dated
3.3.1994. Nine out of 10 petitioners joined the posts of Lecturers and Readers respectively on
4.3.1994. On a reference under Section 31(8) of the U.P. State University Act, 1973, the
Chancellor approved the name of Dr. Dinesh Mani (petitioner No. 8) on 27.6.1994
(Annexure-15). The appointments of the petitioners excepting that of Dr. Dinesh Mani
(petitioner no. 8) were confirmed on 4.3.1995. Subsequently the appointment of the petitioners
were cancelled by the State Government by an order dated 3rd July/8th August, 1995
(Annexure-11) in exercise of the power under Section 6 of the Act No. 4 of 1994 and a notice of
termination of service dated 7.8.1995 (Annexure-5) were issued to them. These orders have
given rise to the writ petition No. 21723 of 1995 filed on 11.8.1995.
3.2. Pursuant to the interim order dated 11.8.1995 passed in the said writ petition No. 21723 of
1995, hereinafter referred to as the first writ petition, the Special Secretary, Higher Education
afforded oral hearing to the petitioners on 25.8.1995, on the basis of the petitioners'
representation (Annexure-7). The Special Secretary, submitted his report (Annexure-9) on
11.10.1995. The Governor also gave an audience to the petitioners on 13.11.1995. It is alleged
that no order has been passed. The petitioners challenged the said report by means of amendment
since allowed Dr. Krishna Srivastava, the petitioner No. 1 alone filed yet another writ petition
being No. 8265 of 1996 challenging the self same report.
3.3. Apart from the petitioners one Sri T. Padarsami and Sri S. Sunderson were also selected in
the same process for two other posts of Readers. But they did not join. Therefore, in February,
1995, the said two posts were advertised. The names of Dr. A.P. Mishra and Dr. Alok Srivastava,
figured in the waiting list prepared in the same process through which the petitioners were
selected. On their representations, the Chancellor by his order dated 6.6.1995 (Annexure-14)
directed the University to appoint them in the said two posts since advertised. But this order
having not been complied with, writ petition No. 19104 of 1995 was filed on 17.7.1995 by Dr.
A.P. Mishra and Dr. Alok Srivastava. The said writ petition was allowed by this Court on
16.8.1995. But the said judgment was reversed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court through a
judgment dated 16.12.1995 in Civil Appeal No. 16988 of 1996.
3.4. Dr. Satyendra Prasad Yadav and Dr. Vimla Vyas (petitioners in writ petition No. 22240 of
1995) had also appeared in the interview held between 12.12.1993 and 15.12.1993. But they
were not selected. The reference to the Chancellor under Section 68 of the U.P. State
Universities Act, 1973, against the selection of the petitioners, at the behest of Dr. S.P. Yadav
and Dr. Vyas and others, was rejected on 30.4.1995. Challenging the said order Dr. Yadav and
Dr. Vyas filed writ petition No. 22240 of 1995. This writ petition was heard alongwith writ
petition No. 21723 of 1995.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.