JAI PRAKASH AGARWAL Vs. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY S D M SADAR DEORIA
LAWS(ALL)-1998-11-101
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on November 25,1998

JAI PRAKASH AGARWAL Appellant
VERSUS
PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY/S.D.M., SADAR, DEORIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

R.R.K.Trivedi, J. - (1.) Jai Prakash Agarwal, respondent No. 4 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33181 of 1998 has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 23rd October. 1998, passed by the single Judge by which he stayed the operation of the order dated 29.9.1998, passed by the prescribed authority, respondent No. 1. At the time of admission/hearing of this appeal, learned counsel for the respondents raised preliminary objection on 29th October. 1998 against the maintainability of the appeal. It was submitted that as prescribed authority by his order decided the dispute of election as a tribunal between the parties, which was subject-matter of challenge in the writ petition, from orders passed in such a writ petition, special appeal under Chapter VIII. Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, is not legally maintainable. Considering the preliminary objection, we gave time to the learned counsel for the parties and fixed 30th October. 1998 for hearing on this preliminary objection.
(2.) We have heard Sri. R. N. Singh, learned Senior Advocate for appellant and Sri A. C. Tirpath, learned counsel for the respondents Nos. 4 and 5 and learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
(3.) Facts giving rise to this petition are that Ghanshyam Dass Sigatia Arya Trust. Deoria. Is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act. 1860 and its registration number is 402 of 1946-47. A dispute was raised on 28.12.97 before the Assistant Registrar. Firms. Societies and Chits, U. P.. Gorakhpur in connection with the functioning of Trust on which a notice was issued to the opposite parties. After hearing parties. Assistant Registrar, respondent No. 2 referred the dispute to the prescribed authority under Section 25 (1) of the Societies Registration Act. 1860, (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'), for deciding the doubt/dispute about the legality of the election of the Committees of Management on 16.8.1994 and 2.6.1996. The reference was made by order dated 10th June. 1996. On basis of this reference, the Prescribed Authority gave opportunity to the parties to file their pleadings and evidence and after hearing passed order on 29.9.98 by which he found the election of the Committee of Management and the office bearers in the election held on 2.6.96, valid. This order of the prescribed authority was challenged in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33181 of 1998. In which the learned single Judge passed the order dated 23rd October, 1998. Impugned in this appeal.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.