BHONDU Vs. REX
LAWS(ALL)-1948-10-7
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on October 25,1948

BHONDU Appellant
VERSUS
REX. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The following questions have been referred to us for decision by a learned single Judge of this Court: 1. When does an investigation by the police start ? la it immediately after the registration of the case by the police or when it starts to ascertain the actual Offence and the culprits thereof ?
(2.) II after the first information report the complainant hands over a list of the stolen property to the Sub-Inspector as soon as he arrives on the spot for Investigation, is such a liet inadmissible In evidenoe under Section 162, Criminal P. C.? 2. The facts necessary for a propee decision of the questions involved are these. On the night between 13th and 14th August 1946, a burglary took place at the house of one Mohammad Yusuf in the town of Said pur, diatriot Ghazipur. He discovered it in the morning and sent a slip to the police informing it of the theft. No suapicioa was expressed against any one in the blip; nor was the Hat of property stolen given in it. It was as follows: To The Sub-Inspector of Police Police Station Said pur. Sir. Compliments. A theft was committed in my female apartment last night. Four or five boxes are lying open in a field to the east of the house. The articles with cash and ornaments, kept in them, are missing. Submitted for information. Dated the Sd. Muhammad Yusuf Abbaai, 14th August 1946, in autograph.
(3.) After making this report, Mohammad Yusuf prepared a list of stolen property which is Ex. P-2. Mohammad Yusuf stated that he was taking the list to the police station when the Sub-Inspector arrived and then he gave the list to him. The Sub-Inspector also corroborated the statement of Mohammad Yusuf and stated that the list bad been handed over to him when he went to the village for investigation. Thus, the list was given to the Sub-Inspector before he actually recorded the statement of any witness in connection with the investigation of the case. The question is whether the list was inadmissible because it had been given to the police officer after the first information report had been lodged and after fiche police officer had started from the police station and had gone to the village for investigation of the crime.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.