KULDIP SINGH AND 5 OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U P AND 8 OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-2018-2-261
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 06,2018

Kuldip Singh And 5 Others Appellant
VERSUS
State Of U P And 8 Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) State Council of Education Research & Training (SCERT) issued a Training Policy, 2006 for a course of two years B.T.C.training. As per the policy, marks and divisions were awarded namely; Written Exam 60% and above -Ist Division 50 to 59 % - IInd Division 40 to 49%-IIIrd Division Less than 40% - Fail Practical 70% and above - Ist Division 60 to 69% -IInd Division 50 to 59% -IIIrd Division Less than 50% -Fail.
(2.) In 2013, a new training Policy, 2013 was issued in which the syllabus of the BTC course remained the same but the evaluation system was modified. As per this policy, instead of awarding division, grades were to be awarded, namely; Written Exam 80% and above -Grade A 65 to 79% -Grade B 50 to 64% - Grade C Below 50 -Fail Internal 85% and above -Grade A 70 to 84% -Grade B 60 to 69% -Grade C Less than 60 -Fail
(3.) Under the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules), the selection of Assistant Teachers was to be made on the basis of merit of the academic qualification along with BTC & TET. While TET was the eligibility criteria, quality points were required to be awarded under these Rules read with Appendix I and II thereto. Thus, Ist division was given 12 quality points, IInd division was given 6 quality points and IIIrd division was given 3 quality points. Under the Rules, quality points are however not awarded against any grade since there is no provision.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.