RAHUL SAHNI Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2018-3-66
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on March 12,2018

Rahul Sahni Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Rang Nath Pandey, J. - (1.) Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
(2.) Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant, is taken on record.
(3.) This bail application has been preferred by the accused-applicant, namely, Rahul Sahni, who is involved in case crime No.327 of 2017 under Sections 394, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Ghosi, District Mau.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.