SOMPAL AND 02 OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2018-10-99
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on October 11,2018

Sompal And 02 Others Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. - (1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the allegations made in the complaint is that the complainant was at her dilapidated house for the cleaning purposes, in the meantime, on 15.11.2012 at 1.00 to 2.00 p.m., the petitioners came there, abused, teased and beaten to the complainant. The aforesaid incident was seen by Hote Lal and Jagan Lal. It is further submitted that after the aforesaid incident, when the complainant and her husband were going to lodge a report at police station concerned, on the way, the petitioners again met and beaten to the complainant, threatened and snatched 6 grams golden ornament and cash of Rs.3,500/- from them. The said incident was also seen by the witnesses. It is further submitted that the complainant Durga Devi in her statement recorded under section 200 Cr.P.C has not supported the allegations made in the complaint and has set up a new story, which is contradictory with the averments made in the complaint. It is also submitted that the learned Magistrate without considering the averments made in the complaint has passed the order of summoning dated 12.07.2013, there-against the petitioners have preferred the revision before the Special Judge (E.C.), Act, but the same was wrongly dismissed vide order dated 25.5.2018. Both the Courts below have committed an error in passing the orders impugned, which deserve to be set aside.
(3.) Learned AGA opposed the contentions raised on behalf of petitioners and submitted that the impugned orders have been passed after considering the facts and reasons stated in the complaint, statement recorded under section 200 Cr.P.C as well as statement of witnesses recorded under section 202 Cr.P.C. The Courts below passed the orders impugned after going through the material available on record, therefore, there is no illegality or error in the orders aforesaid, the instant writ petition deserves to be dismissed.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.