JUDGEMENT
YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,J. -
(1.) This appeal is before us to challenge the judgment dated 27th August, 2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Court No.3, Mathura in S.T. No. 441 of 2007 (State vs. Mahesh
and others), P.S. Farah, District Mathura. By the judgment
impugned, learned trial court acquitted the accused-respondents
Mahesh, Dinesh, Kailash, Pancham @ Pancho, Pintu and
Bhoora from the charges relating to commission of offence
under Section 396, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The trial
court also acquitted the accused Kailash and Pancham from the
charge relating to commission of offence punishable under
Section 412 of Indian Penal Code.
(2.) The entire matrix, necessary to be noticed, is that at the instance of one Ghanshyam s/o Late Onkar Prasad, a first information
report was lodged at police station Farah, District Mathura on
16.02.2006 with an assertion that on the same day at about 6.30 p.m. while returning home from the shop with his son Ravi,
who was carrying a bag containing ornaments at a distance of
some steps, opposite the residence of Sri Madan Mohan
Agrawal, in front of the post office street, 3-4 unknown
miscreants came and caused a fire arm shot to Ravi and fled
from the spot after snatching the bag containing ornaments. All
the 3-4 miscreants were young and the bag was containing half
kilogram of gold ornaments, and silver ornaments weighing 8-
10 Kg and a cash of 20-21 thousand rupees. The incident aforesaid was witnessed by Daya Ram s/o Kali Charan and
Laxman s/o Late Sri Ram Swaroop and several others, who
could identify the accused persons, upon being produced before
them.
(3.) On the basis of the information given, a case was lodged for commission of offence under Section 394 of Indian Penal Code
and the investigation commenced as usual. An application, then,
was submitted by the informant Ghanshyam Verma stating
therein that his son, who suffered fire arm injury had died on
19th May 2006 during the course of treatment. It was further stated that the crime in question was committed by Mukesh s/o
Kartar Singh, Mahesh s/o Hakim Singh Farah, Hakim Singh,
Farah, Banti s/o Bhagwan Das. The investigating agency, acting
upon the application given by Ghanshyam Verma made
recovery of certain articles. At the instance of accused Mahesh
and Dinesh certain other articles were recovered and at the
instance of the accused Pancham and Pintu on 14.08.2006
certain articles were also recovered. The Investigating agency
after completing the investigation filed a police report before
the competent court for the offences under Sections 394, 302
and 411 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 120B IPC.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.