- (1.) Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri C.B. Tripathi, special counsel for the respondents no. 1, 3 and 4 and Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.
(2.) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of seizure dated 11.01.2018 alleged to have been passed under Section 129(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
(3.) The petitioner is in the business of manufacturing and sale of 'Tasla' which is categorised as an agricultural implement. The petitioner was transporting a consignment of 'Taslas' from one State to another when the same were intercepted, detained and seized at Varanasi. The seizure order is impugned by means of this petition.;