RAHMATKHAN Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2008-3-67
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on March 19,2008

RAHMATKHAN Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) BARKAT Ali Zaidi, J. Out of the four accused in this case Crime No. 643 of 2007 under Section, 376, I. PC. , Police Station Kemri District Rampur, only one Rahmat Khan has come for bail to this Court.
(2.) HEARD Sri Rahul Pandey Advocate for the applicant and Mohd. Israif Siddiqui, Additional Government Advocate for the State. Four accused were named in the F. I. R. and it was mentioned that two of them indulged in sexual intercourse with prosecutrix against herwill and without her consent, while two stood on guard. The applicant is one of those two, who was on guard duty. The statement of the prosecutrix was recorded under Section 164, Cr. P. C. and she stated therein that all the four accused indulged in sexual intercourse with her. Besides this discrepancy, there is circumstance that the First Information Report was lodged three days after the occurrence.
(3.) ACCORDING to the Medical Examination Report, she is 17 years old and the doctor has not found any injury on the person of the prosecutrix. The report of the doctor is unclear and confusing. The trial Court will seek requisite clarification at the time of trial. In these circumstances, bail should not be withheld.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.