DHARMENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-2008-8-310
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on August 29,2008

DHARMENDRA SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

SUDHIR AGARWAL, J. - (1.) WITH the consent of learned Counsel for the parties the writ petition has been heard and is being decided finally at this stage under the Rules of the Court since only legal issues have been raised by learned Counsel for the petitioner and, therefore, learned Counsel for the respondents did not propose to file any counter affidavit but have made their submissions orally.
(2.) HEARD Sri Alok Dwivedi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Stand­ing Counsel for respondents No. 1,2,3 and 5 and Sri Awadhesh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that there is only one post of Class-Ill in the institution which is to be filled in by promotion under Chapter III Regulation 2 of the Regulations framed under UP. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (hereinaf­ter referred to as the "Act"). The petitioner being a Class IV employee at Serial No. 2 in the seniority list was eligible and entitled to be promoted on the said post since the person who was senior most in the institution is not qualified. He contended that the District Inspector of Schools, Kanpur Nagar (in short the" DIOS") has erred in law by considering the suitability of the petitioner on the criteria of merit though under the regulation it is seniority subject to rejection of unfit on which criteria the petitioner was entitled to be considered for promotion. The DIOS while considering the claim of petitioner and rejecting the same for promotion to a class III post has held that on the criteria of merit the petitioner do not justify his selection and, therefore, cannot be promoted.
(3.) IT is not,disputed that promotion of a class IV employee to class III post in a recognised secondary educational institution is to be made in accordance with Regulation 2 Chapter III of the Regulations framed under the Act. Regulation 2 is quoted as under : "2. (1) For the purpose of appointments of clerks and Fourth Class em­ployees the minimum educational qualification would be the same as has been fixed from time to time for the equivalent employees of Government Higher Secondary Schools. (2) Fifty per cent of the total number of sanctioned posts of head clerk and clerks shall be filled among the serving clerks and employees through promotion. If employees possesses prescribed eligibility and he has served continuously for 5 years on his substantive post and his service record is good, then promotion shall be made on the basis of seniority, subject to reject of the unfit. If any employee is aggrieved by any decision or order of the management committee in this respect then he can made representation against it to the Inspector within two weeks from the date of such decision or order. Inspector on such representation can make such orders as he thinks fit. Decision of the Inspector would be final and promptly executed by the management. Note-In calculating fifty per cent of posts parts less than half would be left and half or more than half post would be deemed as one." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.