DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA VARANASI Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT KANPUR U P
LAWS(ALL)-2008-8-124
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on August 20,2008

DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA VARANASI Appellant
VERSUS
PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT KANPUR U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard counsel for the parties at length.
(2.) THIS petition has been filed challenging the validity and correctness of impugned award dated 22nd November, 2006 passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Sarvodaya Nagar, Kanpur, UP. in Industrial dispute case No. 54 of 2000. In the matter of Raj Bahadur Yadav v. Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Zonal office, Varanasi. The claim of respondent/workman is that he was a permanent employee of the petitioner w. e. f. 1st September, 1988 he was drawing salary of Rs. 750/-per month, at the time of his alleged verbal terminated from service by the bank from the fournoon of 11th August, 1999 the workman concerned raised aforesaid industrial dispute No. 54 of 2000 challenging his termination on the ground that it was illegal and without jurisdiction as the bank had not complied with the conditions precedent to retrenchment under Section-25f and 25g of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Central Government, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi vide notification No. L-12012/55/2000/ir (B- 1) dated 27. 6. 2000 referred the follwing dispute to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Sarvodaya Nagar, Kanpur, U. P.
(3.) WHETHER the action of the management of State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Varanasi in terminating the service of Raj Bahadur Yadav, former messenger, w. e. f. 11. 8. 99 is just and legal? If not, to what relief is the disputant entitled to? The case of the workman before the Labour Court was that the petitioner was appointed as permanent messenger in the bank after interview and was posted its Sonbhadra branch where he worked up to 28. 11. 88, thereafter he worked at bank's branch situated at ITI Complex, Naini, Allahabad from where his services has been dispensed with illegally and without complying with the provisions of Section-25f and 25g of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 read with Rule-42 of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Rules, 1947. The worker prayed for reinstatement of his service with full back wages and all consequential benefits.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.