JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) List has been revised. None appears for the respondent. We have therefore, heard only counsel
for the petitioners.
(2.) It is regretfully pointed out that in excise and custom matters involving highest stakes no one
is putting in appearance for the respondents and, therefore, most of the cases go unattended on
behalf of the respondents.
(3.) By this petition, petitioners seek quashing of the impugned notice dated 11-3-1983 and
29-4-1983 purporting to have been issued under Section 11 of the Central Excises and Salt Act,
1944 (briefly 'the Act').;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.