VIRENDRA KUMARI RAI Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-1997-9-80
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on September 24,1997

VIRENDRA KUMARI RAI Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) P. K. Jain, J. Heard Sri V. S. Singh, learned Counsel for the revisionist and the learned AGA.
(2.) THIS revision is being finally dis posed of at the admission stage. On 4. 9-86 police of Sadar Bazar Jhansi intercepted Ambassador Car No. MP-06-W-40230 from which 25 wooden boxes of English liquor were recovered which were being transported un-authorizedly. A case under Section 60 of the Excise Act was registered. The present revisionist claiming to be the registered owner of the said vehicle prayed for release of the said vehicle. Application for release was rejected. Simultaneously the District Magistrate, Jhansi on the report of S. O. P. S. Sadar Bazar, Jhasi initiated proceeding under Section 72 for confisca tion of the vehicle. The revisionist on notice being issued to him filed his objec tion stating that he is owner of the vehicle. He had come to Jhansi from Gwalior to meet his brother-in-law. The vehicle went out of order and was left at the house of the brother-in-law. On 5-9-96 he read in Newspaper that the vehicle was seized by the police for transporting contraband liq uor. The vehicle was not used by him for transporting the liquor. A plea also ap pears to have been taken that he has no knowledge of the vehicle being used for the said offence nor it was used with his connivance. In support of his objection the. revisionist examined some witnesses. The learned District Magistrate after going through the evidence overruled the objec tion and directed that the vehicle shall be confiscated- till the case pending against the accused persons under Section 60 of the Excise Act is finally disposed of. He also directed that till further orders the vehicle shall remain in custody of police station Sadar Bazar, Jhansi.
(3.) APPEAL was filed against this order before the Sessions Judge, Jhansi and the same was finally disposed of by Vth Addl. Sessions Judge, Jhansi vide judgment and order dated 11-6-97. The appellate Court dismissed the appeal. By the present revision, the revisionist has challenged the order of the learned District Magistrate temporarily confiscating the vehicle as also the order of the appellate Court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.