JUDGEMENT
Mehrotra, J. -
(1.) This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that an order passed by the
Sub-divisional Magistrate, Sardhana," dated the 21st of October, 1955, under the Panchayat Raj
Act be quashed.
(2.) The petitioner filed a complaint against the opposite parties under Sections 352 and 427, I. P.
C., on the allegation that he had a grove in village, Daulri, which had Kalmi mango and guava
plants some six or seven years old and the accused trespassed into the said grove and cut three
plants and broke branches of four other trees. The case was transferred to the Nayaya Panchayat
and on the 11th July, 1955, both the parties appeared before the Nayaya Panchayat and en that
date the complainant and his witness were examined. Thereafter 14th of July, 1955, was fixed
for local inspection and 18th of July, 1955 was fixed for the next hearing of the case. On 18th
July, 1955 some more prosecution Witnesses were examined and on 25th July, 1955 the accused
and the witnesses were examined. On 1st of August, 1955 judgment was delivered and the
accused were found guilty and sentence of fine was passed against them. At the time of the
delivery of the judgment all the three panches were not present; only two of the panches were
present but the signatures of all the three panches were present on the judgment. On revision the
Sub-divisional Magistrate set aside the order of the Nyaya Panchayat dated the 1st August, 1955
on the ground that one of the panches was not present on the date on which judgment was
pronounced although signatures of all the three panches were obtained on the judgment. It is this
order of the Sub-divisional Magistrate which has been challenged by means of this writ petition.
(3.) The main contention raised by the counsel for the petitioner is that the trial was held by three
panches but it was the pronouncement of judgment which was done by only two panches, There
was no violation of the provisions of the Panchayat Raj Act and thus the order of the
Sub-Divisional Magistrate was illegal.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.