ANIL KUMAR SHARMA Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION
LAWS(ALL)-2017-4-152
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on April 13,2017

ANIL KUMAR SHARMA Appellant
VERSUS
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION Respondents

JUDGEMENT

D.S.TRIPATHI,J. - (1.) By means of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, prayer has been made to issue writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the punishment order dated 30.05.2014 passed by the Disciplinary Authority (Annexure No. 20 to the writ petition) and appellate order dated 13.01.2015 passed by the Appellate Authority (Annexure No. 22 to the writ petition).
(2.) Facts giving rise to this writ petition, in brief, are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Development Officer in Life Insurance Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation'). Later on, he was promoted to the post of Administrative Officer and thereafter promoted to the post of Senior Administrative Officer at Dehradun. While working at Dehradun, he received communication dated 22.11.2012 sent by the Executive Director (Personnel) referring to a complaint of Principal, Mariampur High School, Kanpur, wherein it was alleged that the petitioner accepted bribe of Rs. 37,500/- from the said Institution, while being posted there and he was directed to submit his explanation regarding the same. Petitioner submitted his explanation on 30.11.2012 and annexed a communication dated 26.11.2012 of Principal of the said Institution mentioning therein that the complaint was lodged against the petitioner due to some misguidance, which is not pressed.
(3.) A charge-sheet dated 12.12.2012 was served to the petitioner, wherein two charges were levelled against him, which are reproduced below:- "Charge No. 1: That you demanded and accepted an amount of Rs.37500/- as bribe from Sister Kripa, Principal, Mariampur High School, Kanpur against the first instalment of Rs. 150000/- released to the institution by the Corporation, of the sanctioned amount of Rs. 349275/- under LIC Golden Jubliee foundation for development of land as playground for indoor games and furniture of their school. Thus you have not only displayed lack of integrity but have also brought disrepute to the Corporation by your act. Charge No. 2: That you have coerced the complainant to withdraw the complaint against you." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.