RAJ KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri R.C. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

(2.) Petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the District Deputy Director of Consolidation affirming the order passed by the of Settlement Officer of Consolidation, whereby, the order of the Consolidation Officer directing to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue record has been reversed.

(3.) During consolidation proceedings objection came to be filed by the petitioner under Sec. 9(A)2 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, before the Consolidation Officer contending that he is landless agricultural labour belonging to scheduled caste community and is in possession of the disputed property prior to the cut of date i.e. 30 June 1985, therefore, the disputed plot stood settled as bhumidhar with nontransferable rights in terms of Sec. 122-B (4F) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Act). The objection was allowed upon recording the statement of one Tulsi and member of the Consolidation Committee.