JUDGEMENT
SATYA NARAIN AGNIHOTRI,J. -
(1.) Being aggrieved with the judgment and order
dated 29.11.2016 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge
(Essential Commodities Act), Bahraich in Sessions Trial No. 301 of 2004,
under Sections 323/34 and 452 I.P.C. arising out of Case Crime No. 263 of
1996, under Sections 323/34, 308/34 and 452 I.P.C., Police Station Dargah Shareef, District Bahraich, whereby learned Trial Judge held guilty to
accused appellants Kedar and Vajaee under Sections 323/34 and 452 I.P.C.
and sentenced under Section 323/34 I.P.C. for imprisonment of one year
with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and under Section 452 I.P.C. for two years
rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 5,000/- to each of the accused
appellants and in default of payment of fine additional imprisonment of
two months and three months respectively, appellants preferred this
appeal.
(2.) According to the prosecution in the intervening night of 10/11.10.1996 at about 2 A.M. accused Vijay Kumar along with two-three other accused
persons entered in the house of complainant Sitaram and caused injuries
to his son Saktu Ram and daughter-in-law Smt. Reena Devi with stick. When
injured Saktu Ram and Smt. Reena Devi raised alarm then complainant and
his other sons came on the spot to save his son and daughter-in-law and
hearing the noise of quarrel few persons of the vicinity also came there
who tried to apprehend the accused persons but they managed to escape
away from the place of occurrence. Due to non availability of conveyance
as the incident took place in wee hours, the complainant went to police
station in the morning along with his son and daughter-in-law and
submitted an application Exhibit Ka-4 in pursuance of which a formal
F.I.R. Exhibit Ka-1 was registered. After registration of the F.I.R.
injured Saktu Ram and Smt. Reena Devi were sent to District Hospital
Bahraich where the injury of both the injured persons were examined by
the Emergency Medical Officer, the injury reports are Exhibits Ka-2 and
Ka-3. The Investigating Officer visited the place of occurrence on
13.10.1996 and prepared site plan Exhibit Ka-5 and after completion of investigation submitted charge-sheet against appellants and other accused
persons which is Exhibit Ka-6.
(3.) To bring home the guilt of the accused/appellants, prosecution examined witnesses (for brevity P.Ws.) P.W.-1 Constable Pramod Kumar
Verma, who recorded and proved the Chik F.I.R. Exhibit Ka-1.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.