FARMAN Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2017-8-366
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on August 16,2017

Farman Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Pratyush Kumar, J. - (1.) Vakalatnama and the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the complainant are taken on record.
(2.) Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
(3.) This bail application has been preferred by the accused-applicant, Farman, who is involved in Case Crime No. 250 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504, 506, 449 I.P.C. P.S.- Bhojpur, District- Moradabad.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.