SAHBALI Vs. NAKHADU AND 8 OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-2017-1-234
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 24,2017

Sahbali Appellant
VERSUS
Nakhadu And 8 Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Manoj Misra, J. - (1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
(2.) The petitioner happens to be plaintiff in Original Suit No. 1100 of 1995 which was instituted by him for permanent prohibitory injunction in respect of property shown by letters 'Ta', 'Tha', 'Da' and 'Dha' in the plaint.
(3.) The plaint case was that the suit property was land appurtenant to the plaintiff's house and was used as a Sahan and as such it came to be vested under Section 9 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act on abolition of Zamindari.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.