CHATURBHUJ VERMA S/O LATE GUMAN DAS Vs. U P PUBLIC SERVICES TRIBUNAL & OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-2017-3-350
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on March 29,2017

Chaturbhuj Verma S/O Late Guman Das Appellant
VERSUS
U P Public Services Tribunal And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This petition seeks the quashing of the order dated 20 January 2009 passed by the State Public Service Tribunal, Lucknow (the Tribunal) by which Reference Petition No.526 of 1998 that had been filed by the petitioner to assail the order of punishment imposed on 29 August 1987 as also the appellate order dated 8 January 1992 was rejected on the ground that it was barred by limitation.
(2.) It transpires from the records of the writ petition that the disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under the provisions of Punishment and Appeal Rules for Subordinate Services, U.P. 1932 (the Rules) and an order of punishment was passed on 29 August 1987. The petitioner filed a statutory appeal which was dismissed on 8 January 1992. These two orders were sought to be assailed in the Reference Petition that had been filed by the petitioner before the Tribunal under the provisions of U.P. Public Services (Tribunal) Act, 1976 (the Act). The relevant portions of Sections 4 and 5, which are necessary for deciding the controversy raised in this petition, are reproduced below: 4. Reference of claim to Tribunal- (1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a person who is or has been a public servant and is aggrieved by an order pertaining to a service matter within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, may make a reference of claim to the Tribunal for the redressal of his grievance. Explanation - For the purpose of this sub-section "order" means an order made by the State Government or a local authority or any other Corporation or company referred to in clause (b) of Section 2 or by an officer, committee or other body or agency of the State Government or such local authority or Corporation or company: Provided that no reference shall, subject to the terms of any contract, be made in respect of a claim arising out of the transfer of a public servant. (2) Every reference under sub-section (1) shall be in such form and be accompanied by such documents or other evidence and by such fee in respect of the filing of such reference and by such other fees for the services or execution of processes, as may be prescribed. (3) On receipt of a reference under sub-section (1), the Tribunal shall, if satisfied after such inquiry as it may deem necessary that the reference is fit for adjudication or trial by it, admit such reference and where the Tribunal is not so satisfied, it shall summarily reject the reference after recording its reasons. (4) Where a reference has been admitted by the Tribunal under sub-section (3), every proceeding under the relevant service rules or regulation or any contract as to redressal of grievances in relation to the subject-matter of such reference pending immediately before such admission shall abate, and save as otherwise directed by the Tribunal, no appeal or representation in relation to such matter shall thereafter be entertained under such rules, regulations or contract. (5) The Tribunal shall not ordinarily admit a reference unless it is satisfied that the public servant has availed of all the remedies available to him under the relevant service rules, regulations or contract as to redressal of grievances. (6) For the purpose of sub-section (5) a public servant shall be deemed to have availed of all the remedies available to him if a final order has been made by the State Government, an authority or officer thereof or other person competent to pass such order under such rules or regulations or contract rejecting any appeal preferred or representation made by such public servant in connection with the grievance: Provided that where no final order is made by the State Government, authority officer or other person competent to pass such order with regard to the appeal preferred or representation made by such public servant within six months from the date on which such appeal was preferred or representation was made, the public servant may, by a written notice by registered post, require such competent authority to pass the order and if the order is not passed within one month of the service of such notice, the public servant shall be deemed to have availed of all the remedies available to him. (7) For the purposes of sub-sections (5) and (6) any remedy available to the public servant by way of submission of a memorial to the Governor or to any other functionary shall not be deemed to be one of the remedies, which are available unless the public servant had elected to submit such memorial. 5. Power and procedure of the Tribunal- (1)(a)........... (1)(b) The provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 (Act 36 of 1963) shall mutatis mutandis apply to reference under Section 4 as if a reference where a suit filed in civil court so, however, that - (i) notwithstanding the period of limitation prescribed in the Schedule to the said Act, the period of limitation for such reference shall be one year; (ii) in computing the period of limitation the period beginning with the date on which the public servant makes a representation or prefers an appeal, revision or any other petition (not being a memorial to the Governor), in accordance with the rules or orders regulating his conditions of service, and ending with the date on which such public servant has knowledge of the final order passed on such representation, appeal, revision or petition, as the case may be, shall be excluded: Provided that any reference for which the period of limitation prescribed by the Limitation Act, 1963 is more than one year, a reference under Section 4 may be made within the period prescribed by that Act; or within one year next after the commencement of the Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunals) (Amendment) Act, 1985 whichever period expires earlier: Provided further that nothing in this clause as substituted by the Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunal) (Amendment) Act, 1985 shall affect any reference made before and pending at the commencement of the Act."
(3.) It is, therefore, clear from the provisions of Section 5 that the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 (the Limitation Act) (Act 36 of 1963) shall mutatis mutandis apply to the reference but the period of limitation prescribed in the Schedule to the Limitation Act shall not apply and the period of limitation for such reference shall be one year. It is also clear that in computing the period of limitation, the period beginning with the date on which the public servant makes a representation or prefers an appeal, revision or any other petition (not being a memorial to the Governor), in accordance with the rules or orders regulating his conditions of service, and ending with the date on which such public servant has knowledge of the final order passed on such representation, appeal, revision or petition, as the case may be, shall be excluded.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.