RAMU Vs. KANHAI
LAWS(ALL)-2017-7-114
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on July 07,2017

RAMU Appellant
VERSUS
KANHAI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA,J. - (1.) Heard counsel holding brief of Shri O.N. Mishra, who appears for the appellant and Shri Madan Mohan Srivastava for the respondents 1 and 2. This plaintiffs' second appeal arises out of a suit for partition and injunction.
(2.) The suit was filed with regard to land shown by letters A,B,C,D in the plaint map. The categorical case of the plaintiff was that the entire property of the parties had been partitioned earlier in time except the land shown by letters A, B, C, D.
(3.) The oral testimony of the plaintiff himself was to the effect that the land in question was used for cultivating vegetables and that he had seen in this state since the age of his discretion. Some trees also existed thereon.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.