RAJENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2017-5-147
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on May 31,2017

RAJENDRA SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

DILIP GUPTA,J. - (1.) These writ petitions seek to challenge the notification dated 26 February 2013 issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act) for acquisition of 124.3483 hectares of land for a public purpose, namely, Transport Nagar and Vadijya Kendra Scheme of the Ghaziabad Development Authority (the Development Authority) in district Ghaziabad and the declaration dated 23 July 2014 issued under Section 6 of the Act.
(2.) The petitioners contend that the acquisition proceedings have been rendered void and deserve to be quashed for the reason that the declaration under Section 6 of the Act was not made within one year from the date of publication of the notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Act. For this submission it is stated that the notification dated 26 February 2013 issued under Section 4 (1) of the Act was published in the Gazette on 9 March 2013 and in the two newspapers on 22 March 2013. According to the petitioners, public notice of the substance of the notification was given at convenient places in the locality on 23 March 2013 and, therefore, the date of publication of the notification under Section 4 (1) of the Act would be 23 March 2013, it being the last of the dates of publication of the Section 4 (1) notification and the giving of public notice. The contention is that the declaration that was made under Section 6 (1) of the Act on 23 July 2014 is not within one year of the publication of the Section 4 (1) notification as is contemplated under the first proviso to Section 6 (1) of the Act.
(3.) The stand of the State and the Development Authority, however, is that though public notice of the substance of the notification under Section 4 (1) of the Act was given at convenient places on 23 March 2013, but it was also caused by beat of drums on 24 July 2013 and, therefore, the date of publication of the Section 4 (1) notification would be 24 July 2013 and not 23 March 2013. It is, therefore, the contention of the State and the Development Authority that the acquisition would not be rendered void since the declaration was made on 23 July 2014 within one year from 24 July 2013.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.