DR. ARUN KUMAR WAHI Vs. BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY, VARANASI AND ANOTHER
LAWS(ALL)-2017-12-32
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on December 15,2017

Dr. Arun Kumar Wahi Appellant
VERSUS
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi And Another Respondents

JUDGEMENT

SIDDHARTH,J. - (1.) Heard Sri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Counsel ably assisted by Sri V.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K. Upadhyaya, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.
(2.) The petitioner has filed the above noted writ petition, praying for the following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the orders dated 18.08.2006 (Annexure -11 to the writ petition), 13/17.12.2005 (Annexure-8 to the writ petition) passed by the Vice Chancellor, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi and the resolution of the Executive Council dated 7.7.2006 (Annexure 10 to the writ petition) (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents from making any reduction from the pension of the petitioner on the basis of the above mentioned impugned orders and the resolution of the Executive Council. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case, AND (iv) To award cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner.
(3.) The petitioner's case is that while working as Professor in the respondent University, he was placed under suspension by the order dated 24.06.2003 of the Vice Chancellor. Prior to this, resolution no.176 was passed by the Executive Committee of the University on 23.03.2003, whereby a decision was taken for issuing notices to the petitioner as well as to two others Professors, namely Prof. R.L.Khosa and Prof. P.V.Sharma, to show cause as to why they should not be removed from services of the University for being engaged in serious academic misconduct. A Charge Sheet dated 21.10.2003 was issued to all the 3 Professors and the petitioner submitted a preliminary reply dated 07.02.2004 denying the charges. One Justice S.K.Mahajan was appointed Enquiry Officer on 23.01.2004 to hold enquiry into the charges against the petitioner but he expressed his inability to proceed with the enquiry and another Enquiry Officer, Sri A.K.Garde, was appointed Enquiry Officer on 11.10.2004, when on 30.06.2004 the petitioner as well as Dr. R.L.Khosa had retired from service. Legally no enquiry could have continued after the retirement of the petitioner.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.