BADDU SINGH ALIAS SATY VIR SINGH Vs. STATE O
LAWS(ALL)-2007-8-90
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on August 27,2007

BADDU SINGH ALIAS SATY VIR SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) AMAR Saran and S. K. Jain, J. A prayer for bail has been made in this criminal appeal which has been filed by the appellant Baddu Singh alias Satyavir against the judgment and order dated 18. 8. 2004 passed by the Sessions Judge, Mahoba whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under section 302 I PC and a fine of rupees five thousand.
(2.) HEARD Shri S. P. S. Raghav, learned Senior Advocate for the appellant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the judgment and record of the case. The allegations in this case were that on 8. 10. 2003 the deceased Pinru Singh and the acquitted co-accused Chhuttu Singh alias, Udaiveer Singh were drinking liquor in the shop of Raju Singh, P. W. 3. At that time there was some quarrel between the deceased Pintu Singh and the appellant Baddu Singh over drinking of liquor, after that they left for their homes. On the way, the informant Ashok Singh, P. W. 1, his grand-father Ranjit Singh, P. W. 2 and Maan Singh met the appellant and the deceased at about 8. 30 P. M. when the accused and the deceased had reached near the house of Brahamdutt Pandey. Then the accused told the deceased that he would have to get liquor otherwise it would be his last day. At that the co-accused Chhuttu Singh exhorted, then Baddu Singh fired with a gun at the deceased resulting in his death. The report of this incident was lodged by the informant at case crime No. 243 of 2003 at 2. 00 A. M. on 9. 10. 2003 at police station Kabrai, district Mahoba. It was argued by the learned Counsel for the appellant that the appellant had been in jail for about 4 years and the case would not go beyond section 304 IPC as the incident had taken place as a result of a sudden quarrel over drinking of liquor. Also that the appellant would be entitled to the benefit of section 80 of the Indian Penal Code.
(3.) ON the other hand, it was contended by the learned Additional Government Advocate that there was no question of the application of section 80 of the Code, which refers to an act which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution. The incident has not taken place as a result of a sudden quarrel and there was no question of application of section 3041 PC as the incident had taken place not at the shop, but in front of the house of Brahamdutt.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.