JUDGEMENT
Shiv Shanker, J. -
(1.) This criminal appeal
has been preferred by appellants against the
impugned judgment and order dated
21.9.1981 passed by Additional Sessions
Judge, Azamgarh in Sessions Trial No. 262
of 1980 convicting appellants Vishwa Ram,
under Section 304(2) IPC, and sentencing
him to 5 years R.I. and further convicting
appellants Sagram and Surendra under
Section 304 (2) IPC read with Section 34 IPC
and sentencing them 3 years R.I.
Brief facts arising out of this appeal are
that Seeta Pasi s/o Sundar Pasi registered
FIR on 29.4.1980 at 5.30 p.m. against three
accused Vishwa Ram, Sagram and Surendra
wherein it has been stated that on 29.4.1980
at about 2.00 p.m. some quarrel took place
in between Syama aged about 8 years and
one boy 5-6 years relating to the house of
Visrambhar. Therefore, Munnar, uncle of
the first informant reached there to pacify
the matter in between them. Same time accused persons Vishwa Ram, Sagram and
Surendra also reached there and some quarrel also took
place in between Munnar (deceased) and accused persons. Thereafter, he
was beaten by all the accused persons and
took him at the door of Vishwa Ram. After
raising alarm, first informant, his sister-in-law and
neighbourers of the informant Babu
Ram, Hunnar reached at the place of occurrence and saw that all the three accused
persons were beating to Munnar wherein
Vishwa Ram was armed with Moosar and
he was beating with Moosar while other
accused Sagram and Surendra were
beating to Munnar with kicks and fists. Consequently,
he died on the spot due to sustaining injuries at the door of accused Vishwa
Ram. After leaving the dead body of the
deceased, first informant lodged the FIR.
Thereafter, inquest report, photo challan
etc. were prepared. After sealing the dead
body of the deceased, it was sent for conducting autopsy.
Following ante-mortem injuries were found on the dead body of the deceased:
1]. Abrasion 5 cm x 4 cm. Outer part of upper part of left thigh just below glutted fold.
2]. Abrasion 2 cm. x 1.5 cm. Back of left elbow.
3]. Contusion swelling 6 cm. x 5 cm.
Left side head 2 cm. above left ear.
Cause of death has been opined by doctor coma as
a result of anti-mortem injuries. Post-mortem report was also prepared.
After completing the investigation,
charge-sheet was filed against all the three
accused persons under Section 302 I.P.C.
upon which cognizance was taken and case
of the three accused persons was committed to the Court of Session. Thereafter, Trial
Court framed charge under Section 302 read
with Section 34 IPC against all the three
accused persons, who pleaded not guilty and
claimed to be tried.
(2.) Prosecution examined witnesses for
proving its case PW1. Seeta, PW2 Smt.
Kisuni, PW3 Babu Ram who are the fact
witnesses. PW4 A.K. Singh, IO. PW5 Sri
S.N. Sinha, Medical Officer, who proved the
post-mortem report of the deceased.
(3.) DW1 Umashanker and DW 2 Sunari
have been examined on behalf of the accused
persons in their defence.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.