JUDGEMENT
R.K.RASTOGI, J. -
(1.) THIS is an application under section 482 Cr.P.C. to set aside the order
dated 29.4.2006 and 16.9.06 passed by
Addl. Sessions Judge, Court no. 6 Kanpur
Dehat in Sessions Trial No. 286 of 2002,
State Vs. Kuldeep and others under
section 376 I.P.C., P.S. Rura District
Kanpur Dehat.
(2.) THE facts relevant for disposal of this application are that the applicants are
accused in the aforesaid case under
section 376 I.P.C. They moved an
application before the trial court stating
that they were juvenile on the date of the
incident and they also filed some
documentary evidence of their
educational record for proving the
allegation of juvenileship but that
evidence was not found to be reliable by
the court concerned. Thereafter they made
a prayer that they should be got medically
examined for ascertaining the fact
whether they were juvenile on the date of
the incident or not. This prayer was also
rejected by the trial court on the ground
that this prayer had been made at a
belated stage only to delay the
proceedings of the case and so the prayer
for medical examination of the applicants
was also rejected. Aggrieved with that
order the applicants have filed this
application under section 482 Cr.P.C.
I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants as well as the learned
A.G.A. for the State.
(3.) IT is to be seen that it has been laid down by Hon'ble Apex court in Bhola
Bhagat and others Vs. State of Bihar:
1997(35) ACC 835(S.C.) that the plea that the accused was juvenile can not be
rejected on the ground that this plea has
been taken at a belated stage, and it was
held that such a plea can be raised during
pendency of the appeal also. As such in
the present case the learned Addl.
Sessions Judge has committed a legal
error by not allowing the prayer for
medical examination of the applicants on
the ground that this prayer has been made
at a belated stage.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.