RAM DAYAL Vs. COLLECTOR
LAWS(ALL)-2007-1-202
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (AT: LUCKNOW)
Decided on January 10,2007

RAM DAYAL Appellant
VERSUS
COLLECTOR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

DEVI PRASAD SINGH, J. - (1.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioners. The grievance of The petitioner is that he is working on the post of Seasonal Collection Amin since 1978 but his services have not been regularized till date.
(2.) THE submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the services of the persons junior to the petitioner have been regularized in the year 2001, but petitioner's case has not been considered for regularization by the opposite parties in accordance to the relevant Government Order. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has invited attention of this Court towards the Government Order dated 29th of August, 2001 (Annexure No. 9) and proceeded to submit that petitioner's past experience of almost 28 years should be taken into consideration by the opposite parties.
(3.) ON the other hand, learned Standing Counsel submits that for regularization of the services, it shall always be incumbent on the authorities to consider the satisfactory services rendered by the petitioner.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.