J.P. SILK MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE
LAWS(ALL)-2007-7-256
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on July 16,2007

J.P. Silk Mills Private Limited Appellant
VERSUS
ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Amitava Lala, J. - (1.) THE writ petition has been made before this Court that One Time Settlement (hereinafter called as 'OTS') guidelines notified by the Reserve Bank of India vide Circular No. RBI/2005 -06/153 dated 3 September, 2005, is binding upon the bank to accept the same mandatorily. Factually, twice the OTS has been rejected on 20th March, 2006 and 15th May, 2007. The order has been passed under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, from which alternative forum of appeal under Section 17, before the Debts Recovery Tribunal is available.
(2.) LEARNED Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner contended before this Court that since the circular of Reserve Bank of India has mandatory effect, the Bank is compelled to accept the same having its statutory force He cited a judgment reported in : AIR2001SC3095 Central Bank of India v. Ravindra and Ors. From sub paragraph 5 of paragraph 55, it has been pointed out by the learned Counsel, that Supreme Court held Reserve Bank of India, is one of the watchdogs of finance and economy of the nation in certain cases i.e., deal with rate of interest which can be struck down, interest calculated thereon and charged and capitalised etc. Supreme Court held that circulars shall bind those who fall with the net of such directives. For such transaction which are not squarely governed by such circulars, the RBI directives may be treated as standards for the purpose of deciding whether the interest -charged is excessive, usurious or opposed to public policy. We have gone through the particular section being Section 35A of Sub Section 1 & 2 both of the Banking Regulation Act. 1949 as quoted herein.
(3.) 35 -A. Power of the Reserve Bank to give directions. - (1) Where the Reserve Bank is satisfied that. (a) in the [public interest] or. [(aa) in the interest of banking policy; or] (b) to prevent the affairs of any banking company being conducted in a manner detrimental to the interests of the depositors or in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the banking company; or. (c ) to secure the proper management of any banking company generally. it is necessary to issue directions to banking companies generally or to any banking company in particular, it may, from time to time, issue such directions as it deems fit, and the banking companies or the banking company, as the case may be, shall be bound to comply with such directions. (2) The Reserve Bank may, on representation, made to it or on its own motion, modify or cancel any direction issued under Sub -section (1), and in so modifying or cancelling any direction may impose such conditions as it thinks fit, subject to which the modification or cancellation shall have effect.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.