SANJEEV KUMAR NIGAM Vs. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE FINANCE BANDA
LAWS(ALL)-1996-7-49
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on July 18,1996

SANJEEV KUMAR NIGAM Appellant
VERSUS
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE FINANCE BANDA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) A. P. Misra, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel. In vie of the facts and circumstances of the case present petition is being disposed of finally at this stage, even before exchange of affidavit.
(2.) THE petitioner initially challenged the order/notice dated 12-3-1996 (Annexure 8 to the writ petition) and further offered respondents to accept Rs. 12,000 from the petitioner towards the Entertainment Tax. THE present petition pertains to Cable T. V. Entina. THE main ground of Challenge is that the notice/order Aauexure-8 to the writ petition, has been passed without any assessment order against the petitioner. So far as liability of the petitioner for being assessed to the Entertainment Tax is concerned, the petitioner could have no say now in view of the decision of this Court on similar matters decided in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1353 of 1993 and others connected writ petition decided on 26-5-1995, which is Atmexure-7 to the writ petition. So far as the petitioner's contention that no assessment order was passed has substance. Merely because this Court has rejected the group of writ petitions challenging the Entertainment Tax on Cable T. V. /entina etc. that by itself could not be a ground to send to the petitioner to assessed amount for recovery. Under the law only after notice to the petitioner tax could be assessed in accordance with law, hence for that reason, the impugned notice (Annexure-8 to the writ petition) dated 12-3-1996 cannot be sustained, the same is accordingly quashed. Now the assessing authority will assess the petitioner afresh in accordance with law after due notice. The petitioner will approach the assessing authority alongwith the certified copy of this order, who then shall fix any date convenient to it for the petitioner to appear and after considering his case, assess him according to law. Though we are quashing the Annexure-8 to the writ petition, for the aforesaid reasons but since in the present case the petitioner had admitted his liability towards Entertainment Tax to the extent of Rs. 12,432. We direct the petitioner to deposit this amount within one month from today with respondents and show the receipt of the same to the assessing authority. With the aforesaid observations the present writ petition is allowed. Costs on the parties. Petition allowed. .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.