ALOK NAUTIYAL AND 34 ORS Vs. BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI
LAWS(ALL)-1996-11-18
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on November 20,1996

ALOK NAUTIYAL Appellant
VERSUS
BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

M.Katju, J. - (1.) This writ petition has been filed for a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 appoint the petitioners on the vacant posts of Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools in the district Tehri Garhwal.
(2.) I have heard learned counsels for the parties. It is alleged in paragraph 1 of the writ petition that the petitioners have been selected by the Selection Committee for the post of Assistant Teachers in Primary School but are being arbitrarily denied appointment. Petitioner No. 1 has done his M. Sc. and B. Ed. and the other petitioners are also Graduates/Post Graduates and have got B. Ed. qualification. The respondent No. 1, Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Tehri Garhwal published an advertisement in a daily newspaper "Amar Ujala" on 5-1-1995 inviting applications from eligible candidates for the post of Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools for district Tehri Garhwal. The necessary qualifications have been mentioned in paragraph 4 of the writ petition which includes the requirement that the applicant should be a trained teacher holding B.T.C./B.Ed./LT. qualification. In paragraph 5 of the writ petition it is alleged that the petitioners have these qualifications and hence they were called for interview on 17-2-1995. True copy of the advertisement is Annexure-2 to the writ petition. In Paragraph 6 of the writ petition it is alleged that in response to the said advertisement only those candidates had applied who had B.Ed. qualification since all the trained B.T.C. teachers had already been absorbed as Assistant Masters in various primary Schools and as a consequence to the said advertisement 418 candidates wore selected by the Selection Committee. The procedure for selection and appointment has been given in paragraphs 6-A to 6-I of the writ petition. In paragraph 7 of the writ petition it is alleged that vide letter dated 6-12-1995, the respondent No. 1 informed the president of the District Trained Unemployed Teachers Association that out of the 118 candidates selected whose qualifications are B.Ed./L.T. 260 have already been given appointment and the rest will be given appointment in the coming vacancies. True copy of the said letter is Annexure 3. In paragraph 9 for the writ petition it is alleged that the Secretary Basic Education U. P. vide letter dated 9-9-1994 to the Education Director Basic U. P. has clarified that in view of scarcity of B.T.C. trained teachers, it was decided that B.Ed./L.T. qualified candidates will also be appointed on the post of Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools and Basic Schools. True copy of the letter dated 9-9-1994 is Annexure 4 to the writ petition. In paragraph 12 it is alleged that there are many vacancies of Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools in district Tehri Garhwal and that the select list has not been exhausted and hence the appointments should be made from that list before any further advertisement is made. In paragraph 13 It is alleged that in gross violation of the normal standard procedure the respondent No. 1 has given another advertisement published in 'Dainik Jagaran' dated 30-11-1995 inviting applications from candidates who are trained in physical Education for appointment as Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools. True copy of the advertisement is Annexure-5 to the writ petition. In paragraph 14 it is alleged that this advertisement is absolutely arbitrary as a physical Instructor is only trained to teach students about physical training, and he is not trained to impart general education in a class room. In paragraph 14-D of the writ petition, it is alleged that the respondent has not yet issued appointment letter for the post of Assistant Teacher in favour of the remaining 158 selected candidates. In paragraph 14-E of the writ petition it is alleged that on 24-11-1995 the U.P. Govt. issued a circular that the post of Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic Schools should be filled up by the untrained candidates on non-availability of trained candidates. True copy of the circular letter in Annexure-5-A to the writ petition. In paragraph 15, it is alleged that consequent to the aforesaid advertisement certain candidates were selected and appointments have been made by the respondent No. 1 of 38 such candidates who are merely trained in Physical training. A list of such appointed candidates who were appointed on 30-1-1396 is Annexure-6 to the writ petition. It is contended that these appointments of Physical Instructors as Assistant Teachers are wholly arbitrary and illegal. In paragraph 18 it is alleged that aggrieved by the aforesaid action of the respondent No. 1 one Sri Rabindra Mohan Ghildiyal who was also in the select list and was B. Ed. trained teacher moved writ petition No. 37188 of 1995 in this Court in which an interim order was passed and subsequent thereto Ravindra Mohan alongwith five others B. Ed. trained Teachers who were in the aforesaid select list were appointed in various Primary Schools in district Tehri Garhwal vide Annexure-7 to the writ petition. It is alleged that there was violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution and the respondents are bound to appoint the petitioners.
(3.) A counter affidavit has been filed by the District Inspector of Schools, Tehri Garhwal. In paragraph 4-A of the same it has been stated that on account of non-availability of sufficient number of B.T.C. trained candidates in the Uttarakhand Region, the Government took a decision and issued an order on 9-9-1994 stating that a candidate who had B. Ed, or L. T. training in Uttarakhand Region will also be considered for appointment on the post of Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools. True copy of the G. O. is Annexure C.A.-1 to the counter-affidavit. In paragraph 4-B of the counter-affidavit it is stated that the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Tehri Garhwal issued an Advertisement dated 11-1-1995 for appointment on the post of Assistant Teachers inviting applications and in pursuance thereto 496 candidates who possessed B.Ed./L.T. training also applied along with the B.T.C. candidates. In paragraph 4-C it is stated that after the interview 40 candidates from general category and 20 from reserved category were appointed as Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools in the District. Subsequently, the Basic Shiksha Adhikari issued appointment letters to 54 more candidates and further on 21-9-1995, 33 more candidates from general category were appointed.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.