RAJESH KUMAR Vs. DISTT MAGISTRATE
LAWS(ALL)-1996-9-85
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on September 04,1996

RAJESH KUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
DISTT MAGISTRATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) B. K. Singh, J. The petitioner by this writ petition has challenged the recovery proceedings and has prayed for release of the tractor, that has been at tached by the recovery authorities. The recovery proceedings have been started in respect of loan that had been advanced to the petitioner by Union Bank of India for purchase of a tractor.
(2.) 1 have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner though he has assailed the recovery proceedings on a few ground, finally he has offered to pay the outstand ing amount. According to the petitioner the recovery certificate of the Bank dis closes that a sum of Rs. 1,18,438 due from the petitioner. So the recovery proceed ings were initiated for this amount. Out of this amount, a sum of Rs. 7,700 has been deposited by the petitioner. The rest ad mittedly has to be paid by the petitioner. The petitioner ready and willing to pay the said amount if the same is ordered to be paid in instalments in the Bank. Ave considered the above sub mission of the learned Counsel. At the very out set, I am to say that the ground taken for assailing the recovery proceedings are concerned, the same do not make out any ground for invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Con stitution, however, the petitioner offer to pay the outstanding amount of loan can be considered. In view of the above, I dispose of this writ petition finally with the follow ing directions. That the petitioner by 15-11-1996, shall deposit l/4th of the loan amount shown above and also in the Z. A. Form No. 73-Gha, in the Bank and shall pay the remaining amount in four equal three monthly instalments commencing from 1-2-1997. The first instalment will fall due on 1-2-1997 and the second instalment will fall due on 1-5-1997 and so on. A week before the last instalment is due, the petitioner shall approach the Manager of the Bank, the opposite party No. 3 with a written request to indicate in writing as to how much amount would be payable by the petitioner in the last instalment which shall also include the interest. The Bank Manager will give reply within the shortest period of time, i. e. before the date when the instalment falls due and the petitioner shall pay the said amount. All the instal ments which are indicated above can be paid by the Bank within seven days from the date they fall due. It is also made clear that in case the petitioner fails to pay the loan amount as indicated then on the date he commits default in payment of the instalment, the whole amount as due on that date shall become recoverable from the petitioner as arrears of land revenue on a simple letter of the Bank.
(3.) IN view of the above directions, it is further ordered that the opposite parties No. 1 and 2 shall not enforce any coercive process for recovery of the loan against the petitioner till such time as the petitioner keeps paying the amount of loan as indi cated above and the tractor already been attached shall be released forthwith. Order accordingly. .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.