JUDGEMENT
M.Katju, J. -
(1.) By means of this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated
15-11-1996 Annexure 1 to the petition and have prayed for a direction restraining the
respondents from taking any coercive steps to enforce the payment of the State advised, cane
price as declared by the impugned order.
(2.) We have heard Sri Shanti Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, assisted by Sri
Sudhir Chandra and Sri Tarun Agarwal, Advocates.
(3.) We have also heard Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned Addl. Advocate General for the
respondents 1 and 2 and Shri Shashi Nandan for respondent No. 3.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.