SHEO RAJ SINGH S/O MATHURA SINGH, R/O VILL. GAUSGANJ, PARGANA AND TAHSIL SANDILA, DISTT. HARDOI Vs. DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, LUCKNOW IN CAMP AT HARDOI AND OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-1966-10-46
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on October 07,1966

Sheo Raj Singh S/O Mathura Singh, R/O Vill. Gausganj, Pargana And Tahsil Sandila, Distt. Hardoi Appellant
VERSUS
Dy. Director Of Consolidation, Lucknow In Camp At Hardoi And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Nigam, J. - (1.) Sheo Raj Singh has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a writ of certiorari quashing the orders dated October 8, 1964, July 3, 1964 and October 31, 1963 passed by opposite parties 1 to 3 i.e., the Deputy Director, Consolidation Lucknow, the Settlement Officer (Consolidation), Hardoi and the Consolidation Officer, Gausganj, Pargana and Tahsil Sandila, District Hardoi.
(2.) In the petition I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for opposite parties Nos. 5 and 6.
(3.) The learned counsel for opposite parties Nos. 5 and 6 has raised a preliminary objection to the effect that the chaks having been finalised under Section 23 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, the writ petition has become infructuous. On this point I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.