BHAGWAN DIN Vs. STATE
LAWS(ALL)-1966-8-18
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on August 03,1966

BHAGWAN DIN Appellant
VERSUS
STATE Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

B.K. AGARWALA V. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,KUMAON [REFERRED TO]
MANOHAR LAL V. PREM SHANKER TANDON [REFERRED TO]
PRITAM SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
RAMAN LAL RATHI VS. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE [REFERRED TO]
JEROME DSILVA VS. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY SOUTH KANARA [REFERRED TO]
KAMLA KANT AZAD VS. EMPEROR [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

JAYAPRAKASH VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2022-9-122] [REFERRED TO]
HARJI VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-1977-12-1] [REFERRED TO]
BALJINDER SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2015-12-6] [REFERRED TO]
BAHADUR VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2008-7-9] [REFERRED TO]
MANI RAM VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-1988-2-12] [REFERRED TO]
MANOHAR LAL VS. STATE OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2009-7-26] [REFERRED TO]
BABU RAM VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2012-10-40] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)THIS is an appeal by Bhagwan Din and nine others, all of whom have been convicted for the offence of rioting and making attempts to commit the murders of Murlidhar and Phakkar (P. Ws. 1 and 2) by causing gunshot injuries to them. It first came up for hearing before a learned single Judge of this Court, who referred it to a larger Bench, Connected with it is Criminal Revision No. 1780 of 1966 filed by four of the appellants and their sureties.
(2.)THE occurrence is of 26th February, 1963. and it took place in the village of Bisra within police circle Bisra, district Banda. Phakkar (P W 2) had, at about 6 a. m. gone towards Banha Talab to ease himself and Murlidhar (P. W. 1) had also gone that very side to bring green fodder for his cattle. After Phakkar had eased himself and had proceeded in the company of Murlidhar towards Sarju Dube's field the ten appellants, out of whom Ram Kumar was armed with a pistol, Shivball and Ham Kishun were armed with guns and the remaining seven appellants with lathis, rushed out from their hiding place. Phakkar tried to run away from there. Bhagwan Din (appellant) exhorted others by saying "maro" which could either mean "cause injuries" or "kill". The accused persons, who were holding lathis, did not go near Phakkar and Murlidhar who were at a distance of only about 18 or 19 paces from them. However, all the three accused persons, who had firearms with them, fired their weapons. Shivbali and Bam Kishun caused injuries to Phakkar, while Ram Kumar, who was armed with a pistol, was responsible for the injuries which Murlidhar suffered. Both the injured raised an alarm which attracted the attention of other villagers who had gone that side to ease themselves and upon their arrival all the assailants made good their escape.
(3.)THE first information report of the occurrence was lodged by Murlidhar (injured) on the same day at 7 a. m. at police station Bisra which is at a distance of four furlongs from the place of occurrence. The motive for the crime, the occurrence as it had taken place and the names of the witnesses were mentioned in it. Both the injured were sent for their medical examination. They were examined by Dr. M. P. Lal (P. W. 11) on the same day at 3 p. m. and the doctor found the following injuries on the two injured persons as a result of his examination: PHAKKAR 1. Several pellet injuries of the size 1/5" x 1/5" skin deep on the back side of the left thigh in an area of 8" x 5". 2. Several pellet injuries of the size 1/6" x 1/5" skin deep on the back of the right thigh in an area of 9" x 4 1/2" MURLIDHAR 1. Several pellet injuries of the size 1/6" x 1/6" skin deep on the back of the right thigh in an area of 12" x 6". 2. Several pellet injuries of the size 1/6" x 1/6" skin deep on the back of the left thigh in an area of 5" x 3"


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.