JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS is a special appeal by four women whose application under Article 226 of the
constitution was dismissed by a learned single Judge of this Court.
(2.) THE appellants complained that the Municipal Board, Agra was enforcing a byelaw which it
had made in 1948 and under which the Municipal Board could direct that a public prostitute may
not reside within a specified area of the city of Agra. Under that byelaw the mohallas where the
public prostitutes were not to reside were specified and then it was provided that no person shall
let or otherwise dispose of any house or building to public prostitutes or for a brothel within the
area or in the streets so specified. The byelaw further provided for a penalty of Rs. 50/- for breach of the provisions of the
aforesaid byelaw and when the breach was continuing breach, for a further fine of Rs. 5/- for
every day after the date of first conviction during which the offender was proved to have
persisted in the offence.
(3.) THE Executive Officer of the Municipal Board, Agra, issued notices to the appellants to
remove themselves from the locality which fell within the purview of the byelaw, on failing
which fur ther legal action would be taken against them. Some of them failed to remove
themselves from the locality in question. Thereupon a prosecution was launched against them
and the case is pending in Court. They then made an application under Article 226 of the
constitution in this Court, which, as already stated by us, was dismissed by the learned single
judge.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.