JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
(2.) The prayer for these two bail applications are being heard together and the bail applications are disposed of by a common order.
(3.) Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are not named in the F.I.R. The F.I.R. of the alleged incident was lodged against unknown thieves. During investigation the statement of witness Sunil Yadav was recorded by the Investigating Officer in which it has come that there was illicit relation in between deceased and mother of applicant Shiv Lal Paasi. The co-accused Kalloo Yadav has stated that Shiv Lal Paasi was giving Rs.15,000/- to him to commit the murder of the deceased. There is no other cogent evidence against the applicants. There is no direct evidence against the applicants and there is no evidence with regard to the illicit relation in between the mother of applicant Shiv Lal Paasi and deceased. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of applicants or on their pointing out. The applicants have falsely been implicated in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. There is no criminal history of the applicants and applicant Shiv Lal Paasi is in jail since 03.10.2015 and applicant Kalloo Yadav is in jail since 19.09.2015.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.