PASHCHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND ANOTHER Vs. ANIL RAJ KUMAR
LAWS(ALL)-2016-4-255
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on April 01,2016

Pashchimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd And Another Appellant
VERSUS
Anil Raj Kumar Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) By a separate order passed today on the delay condonation application the delay in filing the revision has been condoned and the office has been directed to assign a regular number to this revision.
(2.) Heard Sri Abhijeet Saxena holding brief of Sri A.K. Saxena for the revisionists.
(3.) The instant revision has been filed against the order dated 25.01.2016 passed by the Judge, Small Cause Court/Fourth Additional District Judge, Muzaffar Nagar by which the application of the defendant-revisionists seeking amendment in the written statement for adding certain paragraphs in the written statement to take a plea that the suit was not maintainable at the instance of the plaintiff because the tenancy was granted by an H.U.F. of which the plaintiff was a Karta whereas the suit had been instituted by the plaintiff in his personal capacity and not as a Karta of an H.U.F.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.