JUDGEMENT
BHARAT BHUSHAN, J. -
(1.) This application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short "Cr.P.C.") seeks quashing
of the charge sheet, arising out of Crime No. 271 of
1997, under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 of the Indian Penal Code (in short "IPC") and 13(1)(d) of
the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short "P.C.
Act"), Police Station George Town, District Allahabad
pending before the Special Judge (Anti Corruption),
Varanasi and consequent proceedings.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that there is one Mahanirmani Akhara, situate at Daraganj, Allahabad.
Mahant Onkar Puri was the Secretary of the aforesaid
Akhara at the relevant time. The aforesaid
Akhara/society of Mahants and Sanyasis known as
Dashnam Naga Sanyasi Shree Panchayati Akhara
Mahanirmani, Daraganj, Allahabad (in short "Panchayati
Akhara, Allahabad") has branch offices in other cities.
There were three secretaries namely; Mahant Onkar
Puri, Mahant Ram Narain Giri and Mahant Yogendra Giri,
who were managing the affairs of the aforesaid Akhara.
This Akhara is basically managed by one society of
Mahantas known as Ramta Pandey and Shambhu Panch,
situated at Shivala Ghat, Varanasi, who passed the
resolution dated 1 and 3 April, 1993 empowering the
senior most secretary Mahant Onkar Puri, to sold some
property Araji No. 217 and 218 situated at Bakshi
Uprahar, Pargana, Tehsil Chail, District Allahabad.
(3.) Negotiations with interested parties were initiated but Mahant Onkar Puri sustained fracture in
both legs compelling him to take rest at Mumbai.
Therefore, he was constrained to execute sale deed
dated 24.07.1996 in favour of purchasers at Mumbai, as
power of attorney holder. This sale deed was registered
before Sub Registrar, Mumbai. On the basis of the
aforesaid sale deed registered at Mumbai, purchasers of
the aforesaid plots applied for mutation before Nayab
Tehsildar at Allahabad, as the property is situated at
Allahabad. Nayab Tehsildar namely; Phool Chandra Arya,
applicant mutated the property vide order dated
10.03.1997. This mutation was challenged by certain persons. The mutation order was recalled by the
applicant. This recall order was challenged before the
Additional Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad
who vide order dated 23.06.1997 held that mutation had
rightly been done and made reference to the Board of
Revenue but Board of Revenue came to the conclusion
that subsequent to 1994, no mutation can be done on
the basis of the sale deed registered outside the
jurisdiction.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.