JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard Mr. Shri Kant, Advocate, for petitioner and perused the record. None appeared on behalf of respondents though the case has
been called in revised.
(2.) This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has arisen from orders passed by Revenue Authorities in Consolidation
proceedings.
(3.) The dispute relates to Khata No. 30, 31, 32 and 150.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.