SMT. RASHMI BHATIYA AND ANOTHER. Vs. SMT. GEETA SHARMA AND ANOTHER.
LAWS(ALL)-2016-8-43
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on August 05,2016

Smt. Rashmi Bhatiya And Another. Appellant
VERSUS
Smt. Geeta Sharma And Another. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The dispute is about a shop No.341/1-2, Sadar Bazar, Jhansi.
(2.) Smt. Geeta Sharma the respondent No.1 is the owner and landlady of the said shop. It was under the tenancy of Naresh Bhatiya who was running a stationary shop. On his death the tenancy devolved upon his widow Smt. Rashmi Bhatiya and the two unmarried daughters.
(3.) The owner and landlady, respondent No.1 applied for release of the above shop under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No.13 of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rent Act") for her bona fide need to establish an Ayurvedic Clinic in its existing form or, if necessary, after demolition and its reconstruction. The release application was contested by Smt. Rashmi Bhatiya by filing a written statement. Later the two daughters of the deceased-tenant were also impleaded and one of them, petitioner No.2 Km. Ritu Bhatiya filed a separate written statement. The other daughter Km. Richa Bhatiya, proforma respondent No.2 did not contest.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.