VIKASH ALIAS VIKKU TIWARI Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2016-2-414
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 02,2016

Vikash Alias Vikku Tiwari Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

RAMESH SINHA, J. - (1.) Heard Sri Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Deepak Verma, brief holder of the State, and perused the record.
(2.) This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 15.12.2015, passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No.5/Special Judge, Gangster Act, Allahabad, by which permission has been granted to transfer the applicant from District jail Kaushambi to Central Jail, Fatehgarh, District Farrukhabad, during his judicial custody, in Case Crime No. 337 of 2010, under Section 2/3, U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention), Act 1986, Police Station George Town, District Allahabad. He further prayed for direction to the opposite parties to keep the applicant in District jail Kaushambi or Central Jail Naini, Allahabad, during the judicial custody, in the aforesaid case. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is facing three trial in District Allahabad for different offences and in which he confined in jail also. He further argued that he was confined in Central Jail Naini, Allahabad and thereafter in pursuance of administrative order he was transferred to District Kaushambi, and from where he has been shifted to Central Jail, Fatehgarh, District Farrukhabad, vide order dated 15.12.2015, passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No.5/Special Judge, Gangster Act, Allahabad, on the application moved by the Superintendent District Jail Kaushambi. A copy of the same has been filed and marked as annexure no.13 to the affidavit. He further argued that as per the mandate of Hon'ble Apex Court, the opportunity of hearing should be given to the applicant before transferring him from one jail to another jail. He has placed reliance of the Judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1735-1739 of 2012 (State of Maharashtra v. Saeed Sohail Sheikh), reported in LAWS(SC)-2012-11-5/TLPRE-2012-0-553.
(3.) He further submits that in the other two trials, which the applicant was facing, when the applicant was transferred to Central Jail Naini to District Jail Kaushambi, an explanation was called by the trial court from the Superintendent of Central Jail Naini and District Jail Kaushambi and from the District Magistrate, also. He submitted that the order which has been passed by the learned trial court is without application of mind and it is a non speaking order passed on the application moved by the Superintendent of District Jail Kaushambi.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.