JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Petitioners, Bhagelu and Ganga Ram, both sons of Ram Swaroop (now deceased and substituted by legal heirs) have filed
this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, being
aggrieved by order dated 02.02.1974 passed by Deputy Director of
Consolidation, Basti (hereinafter referred to as the "DDC"), whereby
it has allowed Revision No. 469 of respondent no. 4 and dismissed
Revision No. 451 filed by petitioners and held that except sale
deeds executed by petitioners, in remaining land, respondents no.
3 (Bhulai) and 4 (Ram Autar) each, shall have half share.
(2.) The dispute relates to Khata No. 19, Plots No. 11, 181, 208(M), 240, 243, 208/2, 206 and 240(M).
(3.) Petitioners claimed to be recorded Bhumidhar in basic year entry. Respondents 3 and 4 filed objection claiming sole
Bhumidhari and Sirdari rights stating that petitioners have no such
right over disputed land. Respondents 3 and 4 are off shoot in the
same family tree of petitioners though from different branches.
Petitioners on incorrect facts filed suit under Section 229B of U.P.
Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Act, 1950") and it being decreed, got disputed
plot recorded solely in their names though they have no rights.
Petitioners have sold their rights on 25.08.1969 in favour of Mst.
Sukhani wife of Bhulai. There is no compromise between parties
and names of petitioners be expunged and names of Respondents
3 and 4 be entered.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.