COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) Vs. CHIRONJI LAL VIRENDRA PAL SARASWATI SHIKSHA PARISHAD
LAWS(ALL)-2016-1-146
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (AT: LUCKNOW)
Decided on January 05,2016

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Appellant
VERSUS
Chironji Lal Virendra Pal Saraswati Shiksha Parishad Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This appeal filed on behalf of the department questions the exemption claimed by the respondent society in respect of receipts for the Assessment Year 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 from the institution established and run by it.
(2.) The society set up a Junior High School for imparting education from Class 6 to 8 that was continuing in a premise. The society was registered on 7th April, 2010 under the Societies Registration Act 1860. For the Financial Year 2009-2010 i.e. Assessment Year 2010-2011, the respondent assessee indicated receipt of a sum of Rs. 1,0,2,22,229/-. It claimed deduction and exemption as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act 1961 on the ground that it is existing solely for educational purposes. Admittedly, the society was not registered under Section 12AA nor did have any approval of the prescribed authority for exemption under Section 10 (23-C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In this background a show cause notice was issued to the society on 14.12.2012 calling upon it as to why the said income be not assessed as purely business income, and consequently the exemptions be disallowed as sought by it. The society responded by submitting that they had already applied before the competent authority for approval in relation to exemption under Section 10(23-C)(vi) of the 1961 Act.
(3.) During hearing before the Assessing Officer it was found that since the application for exemption had not been moved prior to 30th September, of the relevant assessment year, the request for exemption stood rejected. It was also recorded by the Officer that during the course of hearing the assessee came up with a plea that the society is running two separate schools, namely a Junior High School and a separate senior school from Class 9 to 12, and therefore, on account of existence of two separate schools, assessee claimed that the breakup of total receipts for both the schools separately were less than Rs. One Crore, and hence the total receipts exceeding Rs. One Crore, was not a fact on the basis whereof the assessee could be assessed for having business income.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.