VIMAL PRAKASH TIWARI Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2016-2-413
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 22,2016

Vimal Prakash Tiwari Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

VIPIN SINHA,J. - (1.) Heard Sri Indra Kumar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shashwat Shukla and Sri Kaushlesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the complainant and the learned AGA. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 3 of 2015, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Mahoba, District Mahoba with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
(2.) I have perused the prosecution story as set up in the F.I.R. as well as the order by means of which the bail application has been rejected by the court below itself.
(3.) Learned counsel for the applicant has pressed the bail application on the ground that the applicant is aged about 63 years and a diabetic patient. He further submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.