JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard Mr Jitendra Singh, Counsel for the petitioner and Sri
Mohd. Altaf Mansoor, who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent -Bank.
Petitioner's father, namely, Om Ratan, who was a Class IV
employee in Union Bank of India, Kanpur, died in harness on
14.2.1997 during service. Petitioner, who is the eldest son moved an application seeking appointment on compassionate grounds
alongwith No Objection Certificate of his mother and younger
brother. When no action was taken by the authorities of the Bank
for quite long time on the said application, the petitioner knocked
the door of this court by filing the instant writ petition.
(2.) This Court while entertaining the writ petition on 23.9.2002 directed the opposite parties to scrutinize the petitioner's
representation for his appointment under Dying -in Harness Rules
and decide the same by virtue of a reasoned order in accordance
with the Rules.
(3.) In compliance of the aforesaid order dated 23.9.2002, the application of the petitioner seeking compassionate appointment
was considered by the General Manager (Personnel), who rejected
the same vide order dated 17.10.2002.
Against the backdrop of the aforesaid facts, the petitioner
amended the writ petition and challenged the aforesaid order
dated 17.10.2002 on the ground that the same had been rejected
in an arbitrary manner by saying that the opposite parties have
paid a sum of Rs. 1,11,023/ - as terminal benefits and the family of
the petitioner would be receiving Rs. 3,301/ - per month towards
family pension.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.